BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:1.0
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20121115T003000Z
DTEND:20121115T020000Z
LOCATION:155-C
DESCRIPTION;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:ABSTRACT: OpenMP is the de-facto standard for on-node parallelism, but it is big, prescriptive and composes poorly. Newer standards like Cilk Plus or TBB propose more dynamic exploitation of parallelism while being much less prescriptive. =0A=0AIn this BOF well invite the OpenMP experts Michael Wolfe (PGI) and Tim Mattson (Intel) and Cilk experts Robert Geva (Intel) and Bradley Kuszmaul(MIT) to present their view of the future requirements, how we can meet them, and whether OpenMP is sufficient. =0A=0AThe aim is a lively debate with a lot of audience participation moderated by MPI expert Rusty Lusk (ANL).
SUMMARY:What Next for On-Node Parallelism? Is OpenMP the Best We Can Hope For?
PRIORITY:3
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:1.0
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20121115T003000Z
DTEND:20121115T020000Z
LOCATION:155-C
DESCRIPTION;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:ABSTRACT: OpenMP is the de-facto standard for on-node parallelism, but it is big, prescriptive and composes poorly. Newer standards like Cilk Plus or TBB propose more dynamic exploitation of parallelism while being much less prescriptive. =0A=0AIn this BOF well invite the OpenMP experts Michael Wolfe (PGI) and Tim Mattson (Intel) and Cilk experts Robert Geva (Intel) and Bradley Kuszmaul(MIT) to present their view of the future requirements, how we can meet them, and whether OpenMP is sufficient. =0A=0AThe aim is a lively debate with a lot of audience participation moderated by MPI expert Rusty Lusk (ANL).
SUMMARY:What Next for On-Node Parallelism? Is OpenMP the Best We Can Hope For?
PRIORITY:3
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR